- What Is Internet QoS?
- Why Is Traffic Scheduling Important?
- Packet Classification and Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
- Types of Traffic Classes
- Multi-Class Scheduling: Ensuring Fairness and Priority
- 1. Priority Scheduling
- 2. Custom Queuing (CQ)
- 3. Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ)
- Multilevel Queue Scheduling
- Congestion Avoidance vs. Congestion Control
- RED (Random Early Detection): The Key to Congestion Avoidance
- Why Congestion Avoidance and Control Must Coexist
- Final Thoughts
In today's digital world, the seamless delivery of multimedia, real-time communication, and cloud services hinges on the ability of computer networks to prioritize traffic effectively. One critical aspect that makes this possible is Internet Quality of Service (QoS), specifically through traffic scheduling mechanisms.
If you’re a student exploring advanced networking concepts or working on QoS-based assignments, understanding traffic scheduling is essential. This blog post, based on the topic "Internet QoS – IV (Traffic Scheduling)," unpacks the core principles of QoS scheduling and congestion avoidance strategies. Whether you're preparing for exams or assignments, this post and our computer network assignment help service can guide you through complex networking topics.
What Is Internet QoS?
Quality of Service (QoS) refers to the ability of a network to provide different priority levels to various applications, users, or data flows. This ensures that high-priority applications—like voice over IP (VoIP) or live video streaming—receive the bandwidth and low latency they require, even when the network is congested.
To deliver on this promise, the network must:
- Admit traffic through admission control
- Classify and mark packets
- Apply traffic policing and shaping
- Use traffic scheduling to enforce delivery guarantees
This blog focuses on the last stage—traffic scheduling—which is central to QoS provisioning in routers and switches across the internet.
Why Is Traffic Scheduling Important?
Imagine you are at an airport security checkpoint. Passengers with first-class tickets (VoIP packets) are allowed through first, followed by business class (video), and finally economy class (best-effort traffic like email). This orderly handling is similar to what happens in networks using traffic scheduling.
In a network context, packets are categorized based on their QoS class. For example:
- Red packets: High-priority voice traffic
- Green packets: Medium-priority video streams
- Blue packets: Low-priority FTP or HTTP traffic
Traffic scheduling ensures each category is processed appropriately, with higher priority packets being sent faster and more reliably than others.
Packet Classification and Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
The foundation of traffic scheduling is packet classification and marking. This involves:
- Identifying the type of traffic (e.g., VoIP, YouTube, FTP)
- Assigning it a QoS class based on Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
For example, if your mobile plan includes VoIP services, your provider may prioritize your voice packets at the base station itself. This application-level SLA ensures voice traffic gets precedence over social media or downloads.
Types of Traffic Classes
High-Priority Delay-Sensitive Traffic
- Example: VoIP, online gaming
- Needs: Minimal queuing delay and jitter
Medium-Priority Bandwidth-Hungry Traffic
- Example: Video-on-demand, IPTV
- Needs: High bandwidth, low jitter
Low-Priority Best-Effort Traffic
- Example: Email, web browsing
- Needs: No strict QoS guarantees
Multi-Class Scheduling: Ensuring Fairness and Priority
To handle diverse traffic needs, networks use multi-class scheduling. This involves maintaining separate queues for each traffic class and employing distinct scheduling strategies for each.
Key Goals:
- Reduce queuing delays for high-priority traffic
- Ensure adequate bandwidth for video streams
- Provide best-effort service for low-priority traffic
Let’s explore popular queuing strategies used in traffic scheduling.
1. Priority Scheduling
Non-Preemptive Priority Scheduling
- Packets in the high-priority queue are served first.
- Once that queue is empty, the scheduler serves the next priority queue, and so on.
- The process follows a round-robin among queues but without interrupting once a queue’s turn begins.
Pros:
- Simplicity
- Predictable behavior for high-priority traffic
Cons:
- Lower-priority queues might face starvation during high traffic loads
Preemptive Priority Scheduling
- Higher-priority packets can interrupt ongoing transmissions
- If a new VoIP packet arrives while video traffic is being served, the scheduler immediately switches back to serving VoIP
Pros:
- Excellent for time-sensitive applications
- Ensures strict QoS for VIP packets
Cons:
- Risk of starvation for lower-priority traffic
2. Custom Queuing (CQ)
Custom queuing allows the definition of queue size percentages, e.g.:
- Queue 1 (VoIP): 30% of buffer capacity
- Queue 2 (Video): 20%
- Queue 3 (FTP): 50%
How It Works:
- Each queue is served in round-robin order.
- During congestion, packets from queues with smaller sizes are more likely to be dropped.
- This method guarantees bandwidth allocation and is effective when traffic volumes are high.
Use Case: Excellent for applications that demand guaranteed bandwidth, like corporate video conferencing or dedicated streaming services.
3. Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ)
WFQ ensures fair bandwidth distribution across traffic classes, even when packet sizes vary.
Key Idea:
- Calculate weights based on packet size and desired fairness
- For example, if:
- Blue packets are 1 unit
- Red packets are 4 units
- Green packets are 2 units
Then, serving 4 blue, 1 red, and 2 green packets ensures equal bandwidth distribution.
Benefit:
- Prevents starvation
- Maintains fairness while allowing priority enforcement
Multilevel Queue Scheduling
In real-world systems, multiple queuing techniques are often combined:
- Level 1: Priority scheduling (high-level sorting)
- Level 2: WFQ within each priority class (to handle variable packet sizes fairly)
This layered approach balances the need for both priority enforcement and fairness, offering an optimized QoS strategy.
Congestion Avoidance vs. Congestion Control
While TCP handles congestion control by reducing its transmission rate upon detecting packet loss, congestion avoidance attempts to prevent congestion proactively—especially for inelastic traffic like video streams.
Why It Matters:
- Real-time applications can’t afford delays introduced by TCP’s control mechanisms.
- Without congestion avoidance, elastic TCP flows might overwhelm inelastic traffic like UDP video, causing severe packet drops.
RED (Random Early Detection): The Key to Congestion Avoidance
RED is a proactive method used to detect and prevent congestion before it happens.
How RED Works:
- Measure average queue length
- Define thresholds:
- If average queue < minimum threshold → enqueue packet
- If in between min and max thresholds → calculate packet drop probability
- If above max threshold → drop packet
Why "Random"? To avoid synchronized packet drops that could lead to cascading TCP slowdowns, RED uses random drops based on calculated probabilities.
This equation ensures gradual response to growing congestion and avoids sudden traffic halts.
Why Congestion Avoidance and Control Must Coexist
RED protects high-priority flows by keeping queues balanced. But when congestion becomes unavoidable:
- TCP’s congestion control kicks in for elastic flows like FTP
- RED ensures inelastic flows like VoIP remain unaffected
Together, they maintain a balanced and QoS-compliant network.
Final Thoughts
Understanding traffic scheduling and congestion avoidance is vital for implementing QoS in modern networks. From VoIP to video streaming, from corporate traffic to cloud gaming, QoS mechanisms ensure applications receive the performance they require.
If you're tackling assignments on these topics or preparing for exams, don’t hesitate to use our computer network assignment help. Our experts are here to guide you through everything from RED algorithms to WFQ models with practical insights and academic rigor.